How to test a new lead supplier without risking the quarter
A test that is too small tells you nothing and a test that is too large costs real money. Here is how to size one, and what to measure while it runs.
For sales directors trialling a new source alongside an existing one
Buyers test new suppliers constantly and learn less than they should, because the test is usually designed to be cheap rather than to be conclusive. Twenty leads over three weeks, handled by whoever was free, judged on whether it 'felt' better. That produces an opinion, not an answer.
1 Size the test around appointments, not leads
The number you are really trying to measure is conversion, and conversion is rare. If you convert around one lead in twenty, a twenty-lead test can easily produce zero jobs from a perfectly good source, or one job from a poor one.
Work backwards from appointments instead, because they happen roughly five to ten times more often than sales and therefore stabilise much faster.
| What you want to detect | Roughly how many leads |
|---|---|
| Whether contact rate is broadly acceptable | 30-50 |
| Whether appointment rate is broadly acceptable | 75-100 |
| Whether close rate differs meaningfully | 250+ |
Most trials should be sized for the middle row. If you cannot afford a hundred leads to make the decision, run the test over a longer period rather than shrinking it.
2 Hold everything else still
A test only isolates the supplier if nothing else changes at the same time.
- Same salespeople, or an even split across the same team
- Same call cadence and script
- Same postcodes
- Same weeks, running in parallel with your existing source rather than after it
- Same CRM process, with the source recorded on every record
3 What to read early, and what to wait for
Some signals are trustworthy within days. Others are noise until the volume arrives.
| Signal | Trust it after | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Data completeness | 10 leads | Either the fields are there or they are not |
| Wrong or dead numbers | 20 leads | A rate this high is obvious quickly |
| Contact rate | 40 leads | Stabilises reasonably fast |
| Appointment rate | 80-100 leads | The number the decision should turn on |
| Close rate | 250+ leads | Too rare to read from a trial |
4 The questions to ask at the end
- Did the leads contain what we were told they would contain?
- How many attempts did contact take, compared with our existing source?
- What did the replacement process feel like when we used it?
- Did the supplier tell us about a problem before we noticed it?
That last one is worth more than it sounds. Any supplier will handle a good month well. How they behave in a bad week is the thing you are actually buying, and a trial is the only cheap opportunity you will get to see it.
5 A sensible first test
A hundred leads, one vertical, your best-covered postcodes, split evenly across the same two salespeople who handle your current source, run over four to six weeks alongside what you already buy. Record source on every record. Judge on appointments per hundred leads and on how the supplier behaved, and leave close rate for the second round.
Priya Shah
Lead Quality Analyst
Priya analyses lead quality and delivery data across every vertical we generate for. If a contact rate moves, she is the one who works out why before a buyer has to ask.
More for lead buyers
-
Solar PV & batteries
What a genuinely exclusive solar lead should cost you in 2026
Shared solar leads look cheap until you count the calls. Here is what exclusivity actually costs, and what it saves. 6 min read -
Lead buying
Speed to lead: why calling within five minutes doubles your survey rate
The homeowner is sitting at the kitchen table with a laptop open. You have minutes, not days. 5 min read -
Roofing
How to spot a recycled roofing lead before you pay for it
Aged data gets repackaged and sold as fresh. Six checks that expose it in under a minute. 5 min read